Accessible prison conditions in Austria: individual adjustments, requests under section 119 StVG and complaints under sections 120 and 121 StVG.
Mag. Christopher Angerer, Rechtsanwalt
Your lawyer for detention and deprivation of liberty
When someone is in custody, every hour counts. One lawyer who accompanies you personally, from the detention review hearing to release.
A disability may make a specific adjustment to accommodation or support necessary in prison. The decisive points are the individual need, the concrete barrier and the accommodation that can reasonably remove it. Article 14(2) of the Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities requires people with disabilities who are deprived of their liberty to receive guarantees consistent with the Convention, including reasonable accommodation.
In Austria, the practical route begins with a precise request within the prison system. Section 22 StVG protects dignity and lawful treatment, while section 119 StVG provides a right to make a personal request. If a decision, order or conduct affecting the person’s rights becomes the issue, a prison complaint under section 120 StVG may be available. The law does not create an automatic right to every requested facility. The concrete measure must be assessed in the concrete case.
Start with the barrier, the required adjustment and the urgency. The selection does not replace an assessment of the individual detention conditions.
Leave your contact details. We reply within one working day.
Choose the description that best matches the situation.
Record which part of the cell or institution cannot be used, what concrete consequence follows and what adjustment could address it. Medical or professional material may explain the need. This article does not replace a medical diagnosis.
Explain which information or procedure was inaccessible because of the disability. Identify the assistance required, such as an appropriate communication format, an understandable explanation or support during a specific prison procedure.
Explain which prison process the person cannot manage, or can manage only with disproportionate difficulty, because of the disability. The requested support should match that need. Several workable solutions can be proposed so that the institution can examine an appropriate option.
Legal protection depends on the concrete event. Secure the request, the response or lack of response and the date on which the issue became known. A complaint under section 120 StVG must identify the challenged decision, order or conduct and state the reasons.
Article 14(2) CRPD requires States Parties to secure equal guarantees for people with disabilities who are deprived of their liberty and to provide reasonable accommodation. The concept covers necessary and appropriate modifications that enable equal enjoyment of rights in an individual case without imposing a disproportionate or undue burden. This is an important framework for assessing accessibility and support in prison.
Section 22 StVG requires treatment that respects human dignity and permits restrictions only according to law. The provision alone does not answer whether a particular ramp, assistive device, form of assistance or special accommodation must be provided. The assessment must consider the disability, the barrier, the purpose of the accommodation, alternatives and the effect on prison operations together.
The appropriate measure depends on the specific barrier. Depending on the situation, the review may include accessible accommodation, adjusted routes or procedures, a required assistive device, an accessible communication format or support during a particular prison procedure. These are possible matters for review. Each example still requires an individual assessment.
A useful request explains the function of the proposed accommodation. It identifies the access it should make possible, the concrete burden without it and any less intrusive alternative. The decision must balance the individual need with security and the orderly operation of the institution in a reasoned way.
The table separates need, adjustment and evidence.
| Issue | Question | Useful basis |
|---|---|---|
| Need How does the disability affect the person? | Which ability, movement or perception is restricted in prison? | Professional or medical material, personal account |
| Barrier What prevents equal access? | Which spatial, organisational or communication obstacle exists? | Date, place, sequence and observable effects |
| Adjustment Which accommodation could remove it? | Which solution fits the specific procedure? | Proposal, alternatives and purpose |
| Balancing Which interests are involved? | Which security or organisational reasons support another solution? | Institution’s reasons and practical feasibility |
| Remedy What was decided or omitted? | Which event and date should be reviewed? | Request, response, knowledge date and evidence |
The CRPD provides the framework for reasonable accommodation. The concrete Austrian assessment remains dependent on the individual need and the prison event.
Section 119 StVG gives prisoners the right to make an oral or written request in an appropriate form concerning their own enforcement situation. If the matter cannot wait, the prisoner should approach the nearest available prison officer. Otherwise, the time and responsible office set out in the house rules apply.
The request should summarise the accommodation sought, the concrete need, the barrier and the urgency. Attach available evidence and explain what will happen without an adjustment. If several solutions would work, list them as alternatives. Keep the date, recipient and every response. In an immediate danger, alert available help first.
Practical point: The clearest request connects the disability to a concrete barrier and a functional solution. A general request for better prison conditions leaves open which right and which measure should be examined.
Section 120 StVG permits a complaint against any decision or order affecting rights and against corresponding conduct by prison officers. The complaint must identify the challenged event and state the reasons. A decision can generally be challenged by the fourteenth day after it was announced or served. In other cases, the relevant time begins with knowledge of the ground for complaint. An imminent danger requires separate attention.
Under section 121 StVG, complaints against officers or their orders are initially decided by the prison governor. If the complaint concerns the governor’s decision, order, conduct or failure to decide and the governor does not remedy it, the enforcement court decides. A decision of the enforcement court may be challenged before the Vienna Higher Regional Court within six weeks on grounds of unlawfulness. Section 22(3) StVG also provides for an investigation and formal decision in specified cases. The applicable route depends on the concrete event.
The provisions described here do not create a blanket right to a particular facility. The individual need, concrete barrier, suitable accommodation and prison interests are decisive. Article 14(2) CRPD requires reasonable accommodation during deprivation of liberty and shapes that individual assessment.
Depending on the barrier, the review may include accessible accommodation, adjusted routes or procedures, an assistive device, an accessible communication format or support during a specific prison procedure. The request should explain the function of the accommodation and possible alternatives.
Useful material may include professional or medical documents, a clear description of the barrier, dates and its effects in daily prison life. The key is the connection between disability, obstacle and requested solution. This article does not replace a medical assessment.
If the situation cannot wait, section 119 StVG directs the prisoner to the nearest available prison officer. State the concrete need and record the report and response. In an immediate danger, alert available help first.
A complaint against a decision can generally be made by the fourteenth day after announcement or service. For other conduct, the time when the ground for complaint became known is relevant. The specific start date and authority must be checked against the event.
Treatment, documents and complaints about health problems.
Overcrowding, accommodation and concrete documentation.
Planning, documents and preparation during imprisonment.
Purpose, limits and legal remedies concerning surveillance.
Legal updates: Receive new articles and legal guidance from the firm through BRANDaktuellen Rechtsnews.
When liberty is at stake, every hour counts. Call us directly or send an email, callback within one business day. In urgent cases, we are also available outside office hours.
Address
BRANDAUER Rechtsanwälte GmbH Giselakai 51 5020 Salzburg
Phone
+43 660 2407152