Check the draft but do not ignore current law.
The 2026 Prison Law Amendment is currently a ministerial draft. Ongoing cases are still governed by current law. The draft can nevertheless show which arguments and documents should be prepared now.
Draft section 133b of the Austrian Prison Act: provisional discontinuation of enforcement where removal from Austria is required.
Mag. Christopher Angerer, Rechtsanwalt
Your lawyer for detention and deprivation of liberty
When someone is in custody, every hour counts. One lawyer who accompanies you personally, from the detention review hearing to release.
The ministerial draft proposes a new interface between prison enforcement and immigration law through section 133b of the Prison Act. The enforcement court could provisionally discontinue further enforcement without the prisoner’s consent if removal from Austria is required.
This article is distinct from the general 2026 amendment overview and from the article on residence bans after prison.
The draft does not replace review of the specific act. This selection helps organise documents and the correct review path.
Already know that you want to send an inquiry? Go directly to the form.
Choose the situation that is closest to your case.
The 2026 Prison Law Amendment is currently a ministerial draft. Ongoing cases are still governed by current law. The draft can nevertheless show which arguments and documents should be prepared now.
If a prison, enforcement court or authority has already issued a decision, the concrete content comes first. Keep the decision, notice, service date and all supporting documents.
Legal protection in prison enforcement depends on who decided and which measure is involved. A complaint should address the decisive reasoning and not merely express general dissatisfaction.
Section 133a already allows provisional discontinuation where an entry ban or residence ban is involved. Draft section 133b covers cases where the person must leave Austria and specific protected groups are not involved.
The key difference concerns consent. The enforcement court could act even where departure does not depend on the prisoner’s consent.
The prison governor informs the immigration authority. That authority takes over the person from prison and secures removal under the Aliens Police Act.
If removal fails or the person returns during the entry ban, the person is to be taken back into custody and transferred to the nearest prison.
Check sentence status, remaining sentence, immigration decisions and travel documents. Identity issues, target state obstacles or legal barriers can prevent removal.
Anyone planning or fearing return to Austria must consider the custody consequence.
Important: The Ministry of Justice text dated 24 June 2026 is a ministerial draft. The consultation period ends on 5 August 2026. This article therefore distinguishes between current law and the proposed change.
No. Section 133b is part of the ministerial draft and is not yet binding law.
The draft change is that discontinuation could be possible without consent in the covered constellation.
Under the draft, the person would be taken back into custody.
When liberty is at stake, every hour counts. Call us directly or send an email, callback within one business day. In urgent cases, we are also available outside office hours.
Address
BRANDAUER Rechtsanwälte GmbH Giselakai 51 5020 Salzburg
Phone
+43 660 2407152