haftrecht.at
Latest

Draft section 133b Prison Act: removal from Austria and return to custody

Draft section 133b of the Austrian Prison Act: provisional discontinuation of enforcement where removal from Austria is required.

Your personal attorney

Mag. Christopher Angerer, Rechtsanwalt

Your lawyer for detention and deprivation of liberty

When someone is in custody, every hour counts. One lawyer who accompanies you personally, from the detention review hearing to release.

27 June 2026 · Mag. Christopher Angerer, Rechtsanwalt

The ministerial draft proposes a new interface between prison enforcement and immigration law through section 133b of the Prison Act. The enforcement court could provisionally discontinue further enforcement without the prisoner’s consent if removal from Austria is required.

This article is distinct from the general 2026 amendment overview and from the article on residence bans after prison.

What section 133b would add

Section 133a already allows provisional discontinuation where an entry ban or residence ban is involved. Draft section 133b covers cases where the person must leave Austria and specific protected groups are not involved.

The key difference concerns consent. The enforcement court could act even where departure does not depend on the prisoner’s consent.

What should happen after the decision

The prison governor informs the immigration authority. That authority takes over the person from prison and secures removal under the Aliens Police Act.

If removal fails or the person returns during the entry ban, the person is to be taken back into custody and transferred to the nearest prison.

What to review first

Check sentence status, remaining sentence, immigration decisions and travel documents. Identity issues, target state obstacles or legal barriers can prevent removal.

Anyone planning or fearing return to Austria must consider the custody consequence.

Important: The Ministry of Justice text dated 24 June 2026 is a ministerial draft. The consultation period ends on 5 August 2026. This article therefore distinguishes between current law and the proposed change.

Frequently asked questions

What affected people should know now

Is section 133b already in force? +

No. Section 133b is part of the ministerial draft and is not yet binding law.

Would consent be required? +

The draft change is that discontinuation could be possible without consent in the covered constellation.

What if removal fails? +

Under the draft, the person would be taken back into custody.

Topics
stvgparagraph-133b-stvgausreisefremdenrechtstrafvollzugsnovelle-2026

Arrest? Detention? Warrant?

When liberty is at stake, every hour counts. Call us directly or send an email, callback within one business day. In urgent cases, we are also available outside office hours.

Contact

A direct line to the firm.

Address

BRANDAUER Rechtsanwälte GmbH Giselakai 51 5020 Salzburg