Evidence family proximity
Family proximity is evidenced through concrete visit obstacles: travel time, costs, previous visits, care duties and reintegration value.
Imprisonment
Evidencing prison transfer: visits, treatment place and enforcement plan
How transfer under § 10 StVG is evidenced with visit records, placement proof and the enforcement plan.
Your personal attorney
Mag. Christopher Angerer, Rechtsanwalt
Your lawyer for detention and deprivation of liberty
When someone is in custody, every hour counts. One lawyer who accompanies you personally, from the detention review hearing to release.
5 July 2026 · Mag. Christopher Angerer, Rechtsanwalt
Family proximity, therapy or treatment support a transfer application only when evidenced concretely. Another prison is not right because it seems more convenient, but because it better supports the purpose of enforcement.
This article is a practical Detailfrage to the existing transfer guide. It focuses on evidence: which documents show that transfer is legally and practically useful?
Initial orientation
Prison transfer: evidencing family, therapy and the enforcement plan
The decision tree separates practical next steps.
Already know you want to send an enquiry? Go straight to the contact form.
Prison transfer: evidencing family, therapy and the enforcement plan?
Choose the point that is closest right now.
All paths at a glance
Overview of all answers.
Document therapy need
Treatment need requires a concrete measure, suitable target prison and link to the enforcement plan under § 135 StVG.
Assess refusal
After refusal, each reason must be answered. Capacity, security or lack of benefit require different evidence.
Separate medical grounds
Medical transfer under § 71 StVG must be separated from transfer under § 10 StVG. Acute care and enforcement planning need different evidence.
Evidence work, not a second transfer overview
Evidence work, not a second transfer overview
The existing transfer guide explains requirements and remedies. This article starts with the file: which facts show that family contact, treatment or the enforcement plan justify this target prison?
The key is a verifiable link between reason and evidence. Visit records, target offer, enforcement plan and refusal reasons therefore need to be ordered separately.
Which evidence belongs in the transfer file
Which evidence belongs in the transfer file
For family proximity, visit dates, travel time, costs and care duties matter. For treatment, records, concrete measure and target prison matter. For enforcement planning, the point is whether the next step is reflected in the plan under § 135 StVG.
Not every document helps every argument. A medical record does not replace a visit log, and a family statement does not replace a concrete treatment option.
Keeping application, improvement and complaint separate
Keeping application, improvement and complaint separate
After a refusal, the reasons should first be read in a table. A legal error points more towards complaint; missing or new evidence points more towards a sharpened application.
This distinction prevents the article from repeating the core guide. It shows the practical workflow for the next filing.
Practical overview
Evidence for transfer application
The overview shows which evidence supports which point.
| Point | Suitable evidence | Purpose |
|---|---|---|
| Family contact Family contact | Visit records, travel time, childcare | Make reintegration concrete |
| Treatment Treatment | Report, measure, target prison | Make need verifiable |
| Enforcement plan Enforcement plan | Plan and update request | Show transfer as next step |
| Refusal Refusal | Decision and counter-evidence | Prepare targeted improvement |
Scope: This article is a practical Detailfrage. It does not repeat the core guide but orders documents and next steps for the concrete situation.
FAQ
Frequently asked questions.
Must a complaint be filed immediately? +
Not always. First check whether a legal error, a new fact or missing evidence is central.
Which documents matter most? +
Decision, date, reasoning, concrete evidence and a short chronology. They should answer the disputed point directly.
Why not submit everything together? +
Because complaint, new application and urgent reaction have different functions. Clean separation makes the strongest point clearer.
In depth
Further topics for orientation
Topics
verlegungjustizanstaltstrafhaftvollzugsplantherapie
Arrest? Detention? Warrant?
When liberty is at stake, every hour counts. Call us directly or send an email, callback within one business day. In urgent cases, we are also available outside office hours.
Contact
A direct line to the firm.
Address
BRANDAUER Rechtsanwälte GmbH Giselakai 51 5020 Salzburg
Phone
+43 660 2407152